UK Transaction Monitoring Alert Adjudication
Live
Adjudicate transaction monitoring alerts, clearing false positives, escalating true risk and producing a regulator-ready rationale for every alert. Run it live here →
Knowledge graph · UK Transaction Monitoring Alert Adjudication
tools/call · query { "name": "query", "arguments": { "goal": "has adjudication outcome", "subject": "DEMO-1", "facts": [ … 36 facts ] } }the same call any MCP agent would make
Every alert ends in one of four dispositions, with a written rationale that cites the governing standard.
This is a reference model for adjudicating UK transaction-monitoring alerts. Given one alert, its transactions and the customer's KYC context, the agent returns exactly one of four dispositions: Close as False Positive, Request Information, Escalate to Investigation or Recommend SAR. Each carries a certainty, the evidence lines behind it, a written rationale citing the governing standard, a recommended next step and second-reviewer routing where policy requires it. Anything missing refers the alert to a human.
This knowledge graph and its accompanying documentation have been constructed from publicly available legislation, regulatory guidance and published research. It is made available for demonstration and evaluation purposes and you are free to download it and adapt it to your own policy.
28 August 2026
40 scenario evals, 37 boundary and adversarial evals and 9 red-team regression tests, all 86 passing with engine-exact certainties, plus a 15-question sparse flow that resolves to the same outcome as its fully injected run.
See this accelerator in action.
We've built a demonstration application with twenty-three synthetic alerts, from a salary and bonus paid by a declared employer to a fraud-matched credit moving out through a crypto exchange.
Run one, or run the queue, and each alert is put to the live Rainbird agent and comes back with its disposition, its certainty, a rationale citing the governing standard, the next step and whether a second reviewer is required.
Open the evidence tree on any result and walk every step the engine took, down to the case-file fact each one rests on.
The cases are fictitious and for evaluation only.
Download the accelerator and try it yourself.
Download the graph, load it into your free Rainbird account, query it from an agent, then pivot it to your policy.
One file, with everything below inside it.
Import it into RAKE to open the graph, tests and documentation as a project.
- Rainbird graphRBLang XML · 157 rules
- Studio test suite86 tests, engine-exact
- Solution documentationMarkdown
- Regulatory cross-referenceMarkdown
- MCP connection guideGenerated on import
- MIT licenceMarkdown
uk-transaction-monitoring-alert-adjudication.rake
Version 1 · verified 28 August 2026
This accelerator is open source under the MIT licence. The knowledge graph, test suite and documentation are free to download, inspect, adapt, redistribute and use, commercially included, provided the licence notice travels with them. They encode public regulation, guidance and research and are offered for demonstration and evaluation, not as legal or regulatory advice: calibrate the policy thresholds to your own risk appetite before relying on them. The graph runs on Rainbird. Community Edition and the hosted test endpoint are free for evaluation and non-commercial use with no service level; production use on Rainbird requires a commercial licence.
Run this decision against your own cases
Contact us to discuss your decision use case.